Science relies on peer review, but the process can drag. To fix this, in July 2024, the journal Biology Open trialled something unconventional: paying their reviewers. In the six-month experiment, ...

In an era defined by intensifying water scarcity and accelerating resource depletion, conventional linear waste management models—predicated on "take, make, ...

Scientific research has never produced more information than it does today. Across nearly every discipline, researchers face ...

Introduction In the past five decades, Afghanistan has experienced one of the world’s largest and most protracted displacement crises. Stressors experienced during the pre-migration, transit and ...

An Amgen spokesperson said it "takes scientific integrity seriously and respects the role of journals in upholding the peer ...

Eli Lilly and Regeneron are among the first seven companies the FDA has selected for its PreCheck Pilot Program, CNBC has ...

A newly proposed rule would change the structure of how federal grants are reviewed and awarded, with downstream effects on ...

Dr. Esen Sefik moved from Istanbul to New Haven 20 years ago because she believed the U.S. was the best place to do scientific research. Now, her advisees are wondering whether to stay in their home ...

A recent report in Nature describes how the Trump administration is weakening peer review in favor of ideology-based grant ...

QED, an AI assistant tool, evaluates the originality and validity of bioRxiv preprints, assigning them QED Scores.

The AI boom has landed in the wealthy region with a speculative plan to supersize a hub and power it with a new gas plant.

Moving forward requires coordinated technical, policy, and educational responses. An outright ban on AI in peer review, as is ...